Harry S driven off forum

[John K.]

Asshole wrote:
>This username is a vote of disgust at all the sh*t* being posted here of late. PLEASE PLEASE get a life.


Hi John. How's it going, mate?

I don't troll.

[Geoffrey]

John K. wrote:
>I don't troll.

ok, it was because you had signed: "John K. (aka A**hole, Pompadour, Son of a snake, etc.)" - asteriks are mine. Now you have changed your signature area, so I cannot quote it verbatim, unfortunately. Deleting evidence is like putting your hands in your pockets and whistling when somebody walks into the room. We all do wrong things, John - it's quite human. Were your parents cross if your grades were not up to standard? Nobody is judging you here, John - you are allowed to be yourself, warts and all. All we ask is that you be honest. Accept what you are and we will accept you too.

[lazariuk]

ok, it was because you had signed: "John K. (aka A**hole, Pompadour, Son of a snake, etc.)" - asteriks are mine. Now you have changed your signature area, so I cannot quote it verbatim, unfortunately. Deleting evidence is like putting your hands in your pockets and whistling when somebody walks into the room.

That might not be the way it happened Geoffrey. One time I put the word A**hole after my name and as quick as a whip Jarkko came along and deleted the word, and even later went on to delete the whole thread. The only record we have is Jarkko saying that he deleted that one word and also saying that it was not Jack who was causing him frustration. Maybe someone with a higher authority around here changed John's signature because they were concerned that he was doing himself an injustice. Higher authorities can be like that. Ooops made a mistake, what I put wasn't really in a designated signature area, but maybe the same rules would apply, but then again it just might be that there was confusion as to who I was really calling an A**hole.

[lizzytysh]

What I don't understand is that what John wrote after his name remains exactly this, with no Edited indications and no asterisks [is there something else that's being objected to and I'm just not understanding?]:

John K. (aka Asshole, Pompous, Ignoramus, and the Viper's Son)

[Geoffrey]

lazariuk wrote:
>One time I put the word A**hole after my name and as quick as a whip Jarkko came along and deleted the word, and even later went on to delete the whole thread. [snip] Maybe someone with a higher authority around here changed John's signature . . . Higher authorities can be like that.


As I have said before, Jack, I am what is called 'an intuitive'. And as well as having inherited my mother's psychical gifts, I have also studied the paranormal at Hastings (I lived in nearby Eastbourne at the time) under the teaching of the late author Andrew Green - one of Britain's leading ghost hunters. We shared an interest in the estate of the long deceased Aleister Crowley, and it was via that common ground our friendship began. I know Jarkko finds it difficult sometimes to keep away from the delete button on his keyboard, especially if an accumulation of negative tension threatens to overload his mental capacity, but this time I can assure you he is innocent of erasing any naughty words; it was John himself. I have seen no evidence recently of Jarkko displaying signs of stress. On the contrary, as far as I can ascertain he is currently passing through a positive and harmonic phase. It's the same with me; if people don't wind me up I'm as good as gold. I am polite and will willingly share snippets of the vast knowledge accrued in the back of my head. For example, if you want I can tell you why Leonard sings "night after night after night" in one of his songs. It comes from 'Howl', of course. ". . . night after night with dreams, with drugs, with waking nightmares, alcohol and cock" - geo

[lizzytysh]

Geoffrey ~

Did you see my posting just above yours, or were you in the midst of writing your own when I posted it?


~ Lizzy

[lazariuk]

if you want I can tell you why Leonard sings "night after night after night" in one of his songs. It comes from 'Howl', of course. ". . . night after night with dreams, with drugs, with waking nightmares, alcohol and cock" - geo

geo I would like to have you tell me why Leonard sings "night after night after night" in one of his songs. I have a very greedy reason for wanting to know this and that is because you mentioned that it might also include dreams. Three night ago I had a dream where I was making love to Raquel Welsh and that Sophia Loren was there as well, an older Sophia Loren, and she was giving me pointers. Raquel seemed to be having a good time but Sophia was telling me that I wasn't quite getting it right and was giving me suggestions of what to do differently. I woke thinking "Gee, I've had worse dreams"
maybe we should only be having scary dreams that get us back on track and so if you could point me to what I must have been doing wrong to have had such a dream I can act accordingly.

[lazariuk]

What I don't understand is that what John wrote after his name remains exactly this, with no Edited indications and no asterisks [is there something else that's being objected to and I'm just not understanding?]:

John K. (aka Asshole, Pompous, Ignoramus, and the Viper's Son)

Hi Lizzy
Keep calm. It's not a big issue. the words are still there but John removed them from his signature file I guess. If you don't understand what is going on - that is ok because it's not important enough to care.

[lizzytysh]

Hi Jack ~

I'm calm; I'm not that excitable ... just confused. I don't recall having seen it as part of his actual "signature" ~ only as part of what he wrote after his name. I agree, though, that it's not important, either way.

I hope Geoffrey can help you sort your dream.


~ Lizzy

[John K.]

John K. wrote:
>I don't troll.

ok, it was because you had signed: "John K. (aka A**hole, Pompadour, Son of a snake, etc.)" - asteriks are mine. Now you have changed your signature area, so I cannot quote it verbatim, unfortunately. Deleting evidence is like putting your hands in your pockets and whistling when somebody walks into the room. We all do wrong things, John - it's quite human. Were your parents cross if your grades were not up to standard? Nobody is judging you here, John - you are allowed to be yourself, warts and all. All we ask is that you be honest. Accept what you are and we will accept you too.

My signature right now, and when you wrote this reply, is exactly what it was when I wrote last night.

Here I was thinking that I was owning up to the insults when I signed as such. Silly me.

BTW, who are you, after hacking into forum user's accounts, to lecture on "honesty"?

BTW #2, I could not care less if you accept anything from me, and you do not speak for the forum.

Ok, you made me do it...

What a maroon!

[John K.]

lazariuk wrote:
>One time I put the word A**hole after my name and as quick as a whip Jarkko came along and deleted the word, and even later went on to delete the whole thread. [snip] Maybe someone with a higher authority around here changed John's signature . . . Higher authorities can be like that.


As I have said before, Jack, I am what is called 'an intuitive'. And as well as having inherited my mother's psychical gifts, I have also studied the paranormal at Hastings (I lived in nearby Eastbourne at the time) under the teaching of the late author Andrew Green - one of Britain's leading ghost hunters. We shared an interest in the estate of the long deceased Aleister Crowley, and it was via that common ground our friendship began. I know Jarkko finds it difficult sometimes to keep away from the delete button on his keyboard, especially if an accumulation of negative tension threatens to overload his mental capacity, but this time I can assure you he is innocent of erasing any naughty words; it was John himself. I have seen no evidence recently of Jarkko displaying signs of stress. On the contrary, as far as I can ascertain he is currently passing through a positive and harmonic phase. It's the same with me; if people don't wind me up I'm as good as gold. I am polite and will willingly share snippets of the vast knowledge accrued in the back of my head. For example, if you want I can tell you why Leonard sings "night after night after night" in one of his songs. It comes from 'Howl', of course. ". . . night after night with dreams, with drugs, with waking nightmares, alcohol and cock" - geo

I suggest you think you're an "intuitive", and as such you can't accept when you intuitive it wrong.

I changed nothing in my post. You're wrong.

And Jack is remembering only some of the story. I was the one that asked Jarkko to remove the word "Asshole" from Jack's post because Jack was calling me that, and Jarkko agreed with me. Jack went on to claim that it was him signing the post as "Asshole", like he was calling himself that, except that this explanation was totally out of the context of the exchange that he and I were having.

[John K.]

What I don't understand is that what John wrote after his name remains exactly this, with no Edited indications and no asterisks [is there something else that's being objected to and I'm just not understanding?]:

John K. (aka Asshole, Pompous, Ignoramus, and the Viper's Son)

Hi Lizzy
Keep calm. It's not a big issue. the words are still there but John removed them from his signature file I guess. If you don't understand what is going on - that is ok because it's not important enough to care.

Those words were never in my "signature" area. Lizzy, who does not claim to be an "intuitive" (whatever silliness that's supposed to be) is correct.

Yes, I did edit this post, and have now edited my signature.

Yes, I have a very healthy ego. Rising above life's adversity can have that effect. It also helps to be playing that character role in the forum right now. Intuit that, and watch a little professional wrestling once in awhile too!

It also helps that Geoffrey broke the rules of conduct and decent behavior and then got all pissy when he was called on it...it frees me up to behave in whatever manner I like. Thanks!!

And this guy agrees with me!

[lazariuk]

And BTW, you're all a bunch of maroons!
Yes, now I've changed my signature. Geoffrey hacked into other accounts; when I call myself "The Viper's Son" I'm making fun of him for calling me that.

Hmmm macaroons sounds delicious. Wish I had a few around.

John, it might be just me but I don't think you are doing a very good job of making fun of Geoffrey. I'm not very good at that myself but if you want I would certainly try to help you improve your skills. As long as it is all in good fun I don't think that anyone would mind. As a matter of fact just today a very lovely woman asked me if i thought that Geoffery could take a little bit of kidding and so I think you might be in very nice company by wanting to make some fun of Geoffrey. But if you have intentions that are mean let us know john because i don't think that we would want to play. What are your intentions?

[Geoffrey]

hey lizzie!!! no i didn't see the post you wrote until now. my daughter and i have had a weekend guest (a young lady aged 7) who had to be chauffered to the quay in order to catch the last boat home. i must have made an error of judgement, concerning john's signature. if you and he say it has not been tampered with i must apologise for suggesting otherwise. i am a 'peace at any price' man, and will gladly bow to a majority vote - despite intuition. i intended to reply to an earlier post as well, lizzie, where you asked if my attitude was a "ruse". i am short of time right now, but will try to reply as soon as possible - and also to jack's dream query. jack and lizzie, pardon me if the following triangular observation sounds narcissistic or insulting: you are both so wonderfully different, and yet i see so much of myself in each of you - so much so that there is virtually nothing i can call my own. doesn't make any sense.

[John K.]

But if you have intentions that are mean let us know john because i don't think that we would want to play. What are your intentions?

That's actually a valid question. Unlike the other bullshit in this thread, it's actually a valid question!

Although I would not expect everyone to believe me, I have no reason to lie. I have no intention other than to have a bit of fun.

Last night on Facebook, I wrote a 10-question quiz titled "How Well Do You Know John Kloberdanz?" Some of the questions are so esoteric that no one could only score 100% if they guessed very well. I wrote it just for fun, mixed in with "What's John's favorite food" and "What are John's sons' names" is my favorite question, the last:

10) Why should I try?
a) Yeah, really!
b) That's a good question!
c) That's a stupid question!
d) Because tomorrow is a new day.
e) It's not trying, it's what I do.

Of course, answer "e" is the correct answer.

Now, if you don't think I'm funny, that's fine. Humor is subjective. Some people think I'm very talented, so much so that I get embarrassed. Others wonder why I get the little bit of attention that I get.

To answer your friend's question, I suggest that no, it's likely that any level of kidding cannot be tolerated. Geoffrey appears to be far too full of himself and his self-appointed role as Forum Intuitive Spokesperson. After all, he takes it upon himself to guide me in how to make friends and influence people in the forum. He probably knows quite well about that, I do admit, having read numerous Private Messages and having a handle on forum members likes and dislikes that I can only guess at.