Hummingbird?

Ask and answer questions about Leonard Cohen, his work, this forum and the websites!
Lars
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:13 am
Location: Copenhagen

Hummingbird?

Post by Lars »

Dear all

Is there anyone who can tell me what the significance of the hummingbird, which appears on a couple of Leonard Cohen albums is?

Thanks,
Lars.
User avatar
dick
Posts: 1185
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 10:21 pm

Post by dick »

Hi Lars

I relate the hummingbird logo to Beautiful Losers. From the marvelous concordance that Marie Mazur has posted of Leonard’s works, these passages seem to fit the bill:

1. 3, Section 19, Book One, Beautiful Losers
...the Plague. I want thirteen-year-olds in my life. Bible King David had one to warm his dying bed. Why shouldn't we associate with beautiful people? Tight, tight, tight, oh, I want to be trapped in a thirteen-year-old life. I know, I know about war and business. I am aware of shit. Thirteen-year-old electricity is very sweet to suck, and I am (or let me be) tender as a hummingbird. Don't I have some hummingbird in my soul? Isn't there something timeless and unutterably light in my lust hovering over a young wet crack in a blur of blond air? Oh come, hardy darlings, there is nothing of King Midas in my touch, I freeze nothing into money. I merely graze your hopeless nipples as they grow away from me into business problems. I change nothing as I float and sip under the first bra....

2. 5, Section 19, Book One, Beautiful Losers
...cunt sap of a thirteen-year-old. O Tongue of the Nation! Why don't you speak for yourself? Can't you see what is behind all this teen-age advertising? Is it only money? What does "wooing the teen-age market" really mean? Eh? Look at all the thirteen-year-old legs on the floor spread in front of the tv screen. Is it only to sell them cereals and cosmetics? Madison Avenue is thronged with hummingbirds who want to drink from those little barely haired crevices. Woo them, woo them, suited writers of commercial poems. Dying America wants a thirteen-year-old Abishag to warm its bed. Men who shave want little girls to ravish but sell them high heels instead. The sexual Hit Parade is written by fathers who shave. O suffering child-lust offices of the business world, I feel your blue-balled...

...who smiled all night while she danced with the football star because it is the foam rubber of his car she lies dreaming upon. Charity begins alone, F. used to say. Many long nights have taught me that the Chemistry Teacher is not merely a sneak. He loves youth truly. Advertising courts lovely things. Nobody wants to make life hell. In the hardest hard sell exists a thirsty love-torn hummingbird. F. wouldn't want me to hate forever the men who pursued Edith.

Suggest that everyone book mark this wonderful tool:

http://www.webheights.net/cohenconcordance/index.htm

Welcome to the forum

Dick
Young dr. Freud
Posts: 667
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 2:41 am

Post by Young dr. Freud »

All this slobbering over the "electricity" of little thirteen-year-old girls was probably considered very brave back in the day. Now it just seems pervy.

YdF
tink
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:36 pm

Post by tink »

"seems pervy"?

It;s sick.
User avatar
tomsakic
Posts: 5274
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

Post by tomsakic »

I'd say it was "pervy" then; nowadays it's brave.
Lars
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:13 am
Location: Copenhagen

Post by Lars »

Thanks Dick. Great stuff. This is really usefull for me.

Lars.
Young dr. Freud
Posts: 667
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 2:41 am

Post by Young dr. Freud »

I'd say it was "pervy" then; nowadays it's brave.
What bull. It was pervy then and it's pervy now. Maybe the narrators's yen for underage flesh was just an attempt to shock the squares back in the 60s. (Or maybe it's just a little too revealing about you-know-who.) In any case, the times have caught up with BL (and it's author) with a vengence. Oh, Brave New World that has such people in it.


YdF
User avatar
tomsakic
Posts: 5274
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

Post by tomsakic »

I still think that nobody more familiar with ongoing art and literature was shocked in 1960s while today - in time of so-called "political correctness" - they're more shocked or at least equally. What did change in BL's reception, since 1966's "verbal masturbation" to 2005's Chow's shock during CBC's Canada Reads show?
User avatar
jimbo
Posts: 868
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:11 am
Location: ireland
Contact:

Post by jimbo »

2when the hummingbird returns this book will begin to speak"

IT IS THE SMALLEST BIRD MORE LIKE a BEE.BUT IT SING.S
TO SOMEONE ONE SPECIAL.WHO EYER IS SUPPOSED TO READ IT
AT THE WRITE TIME.WHEN SOULS COLLIDE.SPIRITS MEET.
like passing stangers in the night.just one second.and its gone...............
Tchocolatl
Posts: 3805
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 10:07 pm

Post by Tchocolatl »

Beautiful Looser is shocking.

It is not a nice book.

It is not meant to be comforting or comfortable - on the contraty it is disturbing - it was and it still. It goes on kicking social taboos in the balls, and even literate people can find it unbearable.

It is not just another matter of speaking gross about porno. Of course it could be seen that way and OK from this point of view, it grows old like habits. Like and old issue of any porn manazine. Everybody knows that regular porno custumers need to increase the dose with time. Now we are far away from lit. and from BL.

But anybody who does say that BL is an inoffensive domestic animal just because of this is keeping a tiger at home saying it is a kitten. (pussy would have been too easy).

A tiger is a tiger in 1960 or in 2007. It is difficult to handle.
***
"He can love the shape of human beings, the fine and twisted shapes of the heart. It is good to have among us such men, such balancing monsters of love."

Leonard Cohen
Beautiful Losers
jim
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:02 pm

Post by jim »

in mexico the hummingbird symolizes love. maybe somewhere else too, but i can't remember. i think i used to know.
jim
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:02 pm

Post by jim »

and the phrase monsters of love was written by henry miller before LC...i can't remember where either.
Tchocolatl
Posts: 3805
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 10:07 pm

Post by Tchocolatl »

While waiting for your memory to come back with something accurate.

"No special group, no particular individual can change the world. I think the world is changed by the aggregate of people in it. By how they live individually. The great changes come by the things they don't do. By their inertia. It's that failure to live up to themselves that creates bad conditions. We always look for some Hitler, some target to blame. They are not the prime cases; the inert mind, the slothful, lazy mind is. There's the quick and the dead, and most of the world is dead. They're not having the kind of life one enjoys."

- Henry Miller in Conversations with Henry Miller P.171

Or :
Push Bush in the bush - but don't look how you are acting with people who annoy you.

Ole.

Toro!
***
"He can love the shape of human beings, the fine and twisted shapes of the heart. It is good to have among us such men, such balancing monsters of love."

Leonard Cohen
Beautiful Losers
User avatar
ania
Posts: 294
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 7:11 am
Location: melbourne, australia
Contact:

Post by ania »

Tom Sakic wrote:I'd say it was "pervy" then; nowadays it's brave.
i would say it was 'pervy' then, and its 'pervy' now.
"It's strange. You never start out life with the intention of
becoming a bankrupt or an alcoholic or a cheat and a thief.
Or a liar." -- Raymond Carver
jim
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:02 pm

monsters of love

Post by jim »

my memory is just not going to come back with that and i don't have any of miller's books here. it was probably in one of the tropics. but its there "monsters of love" or maybe just "monster of love" i remember reading that and wondering if leonard had read it.
Post Reply

Return to “Comments & Questions”