leonardcohenforum.com

lizzytysh wrote:Okay. Your name was placed in conjunction with its appearance.

I was online when it was set though and I didn't do anything about it. Aren't I a bad boy.

Okay. Your name was placed in conjunction with its appearance.

My mistake! when I blamed wens it was me being lazy and trying to use one of his shortcuts to changing the topic, which didn't work for me. Nothing more.

Wens ~

Your answer and sarcasm speak for themselves.

***********************************************************

Tim ~

Thanks for your clarification on that. As it turns out, not that it makes any difference in concept . I enjoyed our conversation .


***********************************************************

At least it's been shown that some have no idea what they're talking about. Guess I'll have to visit more often ~ since I've recently received an invitation to do just that. I can tell I'm missed . Some folks just need to remember that when you deal with someone who's fairly intuitive, it's important not to do things, in the darkness, that may summon them.

***********************************************************

Just be sure you spell my name right . Isn't that what they say to idiots, who have nothing better to do? Of course, that may not be your perspective on someone who originates that kind of a "Subject," or someone who bypasses it, but it's obviously mine.


~ Lizzy

Just be sure you spell my name right . Isn't that what they say to idiots, who have nothing better to do?

That's what you could say to someone who complains about something you've done which they erroneously think is wrong, and they threaten to report you to whoever

Yes ~ I've heard it in exactly that context, too . [Geez ~ wish I'd noticed you were there.....look at all those edited lines !]

lizzytysh wrote:Wens ~

Your answer and sarcasm speak for themselves.

I think you might be wrong there.

Wenslauw,

I have never known lizzy to be wrong yet! You are a very naughty boy for ever having suggested such a thing.

Tony wrote:Wenslauw,

I have never known lizzy to be wrong yet! You are a very naughty boy for ever having suggested such a thing.

I am very sorry, Tony, I didn't mean to upset you or Lizzy. You've met me Tony, you know I'm an honest guy with the best intentions.

Wenslauw,

You apologised just in time. George Bush was just about to invade Holland over your attitude!

Tony wrote:Wenslauw,

You apologised just in time. George Bush was just about to invade Holland over your attitude!

Damn, I would have liked to have a word with that grinning midget.

Wenslauw,

Do you realise that you have now upset the two most powerful people in the USA? How can I admit to knowing you when they come for me?

lizzytysh wrote:Tchoc ~

[Just so you know, for future reference, the phrase is, "Break a leg" . You're welcome .]

~ Lizzy

P.S. :

'Cause the reality is : I noticed how you handled this rather delicate matter with grace. I mean somebody pulling your leg. End of the story.

Thank you for noticing, Tchoc.

Thank you too. Very nice.

Why do I feel like to write when then, OK, break this leg, dear, really? The Spirit of Halloween is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad this year....

Deamons in many heads here seem to have been cut loose. Play to this without me, deer.

lizzytysh wrote:
Wens ~

Your answer and sarcasm speak for themselves.



I think you might be wrong there.

"I think you might be wrong there". . . now there's a declarative statement. Then, again, I definitely could be right.

" . . . speak for themselves."
If not for themselves, then who? Not me or mine. Maybe you should ground them, or at least give them a curfew, then, if they keep acting out like that.

I've met you, too, Wenslauw.

~ Lizzy

*******************************************************


Tim ~

Our conversation had an entirely different tone last night. To think that you initiated it. Guess you're entitled to a mistake now and then; but I think that one exhausted your quota for the month.

Amazing how it goes when 'the guys' get together for that teenagey kind of 'support' . At least I'll know better next time. Live and learn.

Enjoy the photography exhibition in London.

~ Lizzy

Our conversation had an entirely different tone last night. To think that you initiated it.

I'm confused, when was 'last night' when you wrote this? If you meant Thursday evening/night I didn't see you in the chatroom to talk to you then (and if anyone did and claimed to be 'Tim' it wasn't me). If you meant Wednesday night then I can't think what other conversation/exchange there has been to have had a different tone to that.

Perhaps I'm now borrowing from next month's quota of mistakes in getting this wrong too...

"Last night," Tim, for me was the same night you changed the Subject in the chatroom manually, hence the direct connection I made between the two. The only night I've been there, other than once several nights prior and once about a month prior to that, in many, many months.

Since you were the Tim who here knows he changed the topic and mentioned Wens [albeit in a different context, according to you here], you were the Tim I conversed with regarding "Sussex/Essex/where your mother was born/where your father was born/the photography in the, particular art gallery in London/all that London has to offer/your coming trip to join up with the Cohenites/the traveling distance to where you're going this weekend/the differences in 'distance/difficulty' perceptions between the U.S. and Brit folk/Pete's driving me to John and Margaret's/etc." ~ this would be as in real conversation, not flippant, insultingly-suggestive remarks about me in the third person.

As for actual time frames, where I am and where you are is 5-6 hours apart . I wrote the above message on my Thursday night, so with "last night," I was referring to my Wednesday night.

Yes, perhaps you are now borrowing...

~ Lizzy