Book of Mercy #41-45

Debate on Leonard Cohen's poetry (and novels), both published and unpublished. Song lyrics may also be discussed here.
DBCohen
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:31 am
Location: Kyoto, Japan

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by DBCohen »

I’ll probably be out of touch with the Forum for two weeks or more, going back to visit family and friends, and also hoping to meet a bunch of Cohenites on a certain island… But it’s probably better not to have another long gap in the discussion, so for all those of you staying home, here is the next installment:
II.42
It is to you I turn. The table stands on tiptoe. Every object leaps to its place. The closed book rises on its thousand pages and my wakefulness rejoices. I turn to you, my song in the house of night, my shield against the quarrels. I turn to you, who unifies the upward heart. Your name is the foundation of the night. The Accuser, with his thousand voices, stands in the place you are not named. Blessed is the name that holds this house in the firmness of mercy, and binds this song to the rock.
Let me just point out the great accumulation, in this short prayer, of so many crucial words that appeared so often in this book, and on which we’ve elaborated on various occasions: “you” with “name”, “shield”, and “mercy”, the three words which were in the alternative titles for this book; also “binding”, a very important term here and elsewhere in LC’s work; “house” and “night” also appear many times; and finally “the Accuser”, who appeared only once before, in #36, where it was also capitalized.

I can’t resist commenting briefly on the phrase: “binds this song to the rock”, which brings up so many association: the binding of Isaac on the altar, the binding of Prometheus to the rock, “the rock of ages”, and of course, the binding of his song to rock and roll, which was officially recognized many years later…

Following the exciting discussion of #41, I’m looking forward to many interesting interpretations of this prayer as well. Thanks in advance to all contributors.
lazariuk
Posts: 1952
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Vancouver

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by lazariuk »

DBCohen wrote: II.42
The Accuser, with his thousand voices, stands in the place you are not named.
That's a pretty noisy place.
Everything being said to you is true; Imagine of what it is true.
lazariuk
Posts: 1952
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Vancouver

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by lazariuk »

DBCohen wrote: finally “the Accuser”, who appeared only once before, in #36, where it was also capitalized.
Maybe it something to do with capitalism.
Everything being said to you is true; Imagine of what it is true.
charlajoy
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 2:03 am

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by charlajoy »

II.42
The Accuser, with his thousand voices, stands in the place you are not named.
.

The accuser of the brethren (Rev. 12:10) could be compared to Legion, the thousand demons from Mark 9.
It is to you I turn. The table stands on tiptoe. Every object leaps to its place. The closed book rises on its thousand pages and my wakefulness rejoices. I turn to you, my song in the house of night, my shield against the quarrels. I turn to you, who unifies the upward heart.
Quantum physics tells us that the quark, smaller than the atom, turns toward whomever looks upon it, all its energies focused on its audience. The table, every object, the closed book, the author's "turning" and upward heart all signify the smallest bit of energy in the universe who stand at attention to the glory of the I AM.

If the lord of the song gave the song, then it would be fitting to say that the song is a shield.
User avatar
mat james
Posts: 1847
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 8:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by mat james »

Quantum physics tells us that the quark, smaller than the atom, turns toward whomever looks upon it, all its energies focused on its audience. The table, every object, the closed book, the author's "turning" and upward heart all signify the smallest bit of energy in the universe who stand at attention to the glory of the I AM.

If the lord of the song gave the song, then it would be fitting to say that the song is a shield.
charlajoy
I turn to you, who unifies the upward heart.
charlajoy, Plotinus could not have said it better!!
I am delightedly in sinc with your interpretation/view.

MatbbgJ
"Without light or guide, save that which burned in my heart." San Juan de la Cruz.
DBCohen
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:31 am
Location: Kyoto, Japan

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by DBCohen »

Blessed is the name that holds this house in the firmness of mercy
Coming back from Hydra, and having seen LC’s house there – from the outside only – I can’t help thinking of the “house” here in concrete terms. Yes, I remember that in the first year of our discussion I often said that I wish to examine the work independently from the biography of its author, but that’s sometimes hard to do. Also, I know that LC had many houses, and we know that the one in which he wrote BoM (or most of it, at least) wasn’t the one on Hydra, but still…

For those of you who haven’t seen them yet, here are the links to the photos taken by Jarkko inside the house some years ago. It is very gratifying to see in the book closet a copy of the English translation of the great Cavafy, the full range of whose influence on LC’s poetry is yet to be studied.

http://www.leonardcohenfiles.com/hydraB31.htm
http://www.leonardcohenfiles.com/hydraB31.html
lazariuk
Posts: 1952
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Vancouver

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by lazariuk »

DBCohen wrote:
Blessed is the name that holds this house in the firmness of mercy
Hi Doron
Welcome back from your trip.
I was looking at what you had quoted and the thought came to me that Leonard said that he wrote this book for someone like him and I thought Leonard's Jewish and Doron's Jewish. He, being jewish, probably belongs to a house, as do you. Anyway I just kept looking at those words and I kept thinking that he is speaking about Doron's house.

From there i wandered off wondering if it would be true of others. You do seem to match the last line well as someone who binds the song to a rock, that you see so much in terms of the rock of your faith.

Jack
Last edited by lazariuk on Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Everything being said to you is true; Imagine of what it is true.
User avatar
mat james
Posts: 1847
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 8:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by mat james »

“The Accuser, with his thousand voices, stands in the place you are not named. Blessed is the name...”
"Accuser Satan is styled the "accuser of the brethren" (Rev 12:10. Compare Job 1:6; Zac 3:1), as seeking to uphold his influence among men by bringing false charges against Christians, with the view of weakening their influence and injuring the cause with which they are identified. He was regarded by the Jews as the accuser of men before God, laying to their charge the violations of the law of which they were guilty, and demanding their punishment. The same Greek word, rendered "accuser," is found in Joh 8:10 (but omitted in the Revised Version); Act 23:30, Act 23:35; Act 24:8; Act 25:16, Act 25:18, in all of which places it is used of one who brings a charge against another."
(http://sacred-texts.com/bib/ebd/ebd006.htm)

The Accuser/Adversary is portrayed as a human problem; (not the enemy of g~d.)
I enjoy this "Jewish" perspective. It makes a lot of sense to me.
Christians often get a bit mixed up and see the "Accuser/Adversary/Satan/Shaitan as the enemy or problem of God.
Not so; he/it/Satan , is a human issue/foible/perspective/problem. God couldn't give a s..t about s.t.n. the "Accuser".

I often dwell on this Jewish perspective with delight and respect.
It is a very liberating position that leads back to the first Commandment.

“I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
You shall have no other gods before me.
(http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/top ... mmandments)

Many people are bonded to fear. (rather than "liberated" from their fears)
People almost deify Satan/the Accuser; through fear; they give this fear a name and the bad boogy-man becomes psychologically real.

...it is good to saunter toward the "nameless" and onto and into the One, where Love itself (and devils and satans and bad-boogy-spirits and so on) are.....................................gone.

"Then I came back from where I’d been.
My room, it looked the same –
But there was nothing left between
The Nameless and the Name.

All busy in the sunlight
The flecks did float and dance,
And I was tumbled up with them
In formless circumstance.

I’ll try to say a little more:
Love went on and on
Until it reached an open door –
Then Love itself,
Love Itself was gone.
Love Itself was gone." Leonard Cohen

...no room for silly boogy-men accusers and their myriad voices, here.....between the Nameless and the Name;........ Oneness,
"It is to you I turn."(II.42)


...for what it is worth... :neutral:
"Without light or guide, save that which burned in my heart." San Juan de la Cruz.
User avatar
mat james
Posts: 1847
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 8:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by mat james »

I made a few adjustments to my last post.
Love the kimono, Doron 8)
(Hydra photos)
"Without light or guide, save that which burned in my heart." San Juan de la Cruz.
DBCohen
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:31 am
Location: Kyoto, Japan

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by DBCohen »

mat james wrote:I made a few adjustments to my last post.
Love the kimono, Doron 8)
(Hydra photos)

Glad you liked it, Mat. It’s not a kimono, by the way, but yukata, a cotton light thing to wear after your bath, especially in summer (I apologize for correcting you, but once a teacher, always a teacher. And while in the mode of correcting – and that refers to earlier postings, not yours, Mat - let me restate once again (sigh) that my name is “Doron”. I wondered for a long time why “Doran” keeps appearing in various people’s postings, until I realized that many people must be utilizing the automatic spell-corrector in Microsoft-Word, and that this limited device changes “Doron” to “Doran” regularly. Now, as I’ve only recently returned from Greece, let me proudly state once again – I’ve been through this on these pages twice before, so I feel rather stupid going on about it one more time – that “Doron” is a pure Greek word meaning “gift”, and it appears in Greek names such as Theodoros – God’s gift – and hence Theodore, Theodora, Dorothea, Dora, and many more. God only knows where “Doran” has come from. So, friends, please show some respect to an old tradition over ignorant spell-correctors. Sorry to go on at such length on a personal matter, but as Don Corleone famously said, “Everything is personal”).

Now, I enjoyed your post and your input and view on Satan. Thanks for quoting that song in that context. I believe I can see what it means to you.

Thinking of the “Accuser” I was reminded that long, long time ago, I wrote the following paragraph during our discussion of BoM #2, a piece in which an ape was staring, if you remember, and I thought it might be relevant here too:

In traditional Judaism any person is thought to have two impulses or inclinations: a good inclination (yetzer hatov) and an evil inclination (yetzer har’a). Both are necessary for human existence, because ambition, sexual drive and even the creative drive are parts of the evil inclination, and without it there will be no human life. However the evil inclination constantly pushes us towards sin, and our duty is to use the good inclination to subdue the evil one, and not allow it to go out of control (this is somewhat like Freud’s concepts of the “id” versus the “super-ego”, with the ego mediating between them). It seems to me that this ape can be the yetzer har’a running wild.

There were some interesting things said about that ape at the time… I also like the Talmudic saying: "Satan, the evil inclination, and the Angel of Death are all one.”

Δώρον
lazariuk
Posts: 1952
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Vancouver

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by lazariuk »

Hi Doron

My apologies about the misspelling of your name. I intended no disrespect and thanks for providing the excuse of a spell checker, very gracious of you. I made the corrections in my last post and read your last post with great interest. I like what you wrote about subduing. It reminded me of a Tom Waits song: Down in the Hole
Everything being said to you is true; Imagine of what it is true.
DBCohen
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:31 am
Location: Kyoto, Japan

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by DBCohen »

Thanks, Jack, very kind of you.

And as it seems that there are no more takers for #42, here is the next installment:
II.43
Holy is your name, holy is your work, holy are the days that return to you. Holy are the years that you uncover. Holy are the hands that are raised to you, and the weeping that is wept to you. Holy is the fire between your will and ours, in which we are refined. Holy is that which is unredeemed, covered with your patience. Holy are the souls lost in you unnaming. Holy, and shining with a great light, is every living thing, established in this world and covered with time, until your name is praised forever.
Like #42, this prayer is a short one, but so beautiful and full of interest that I feel like I could write at great length about it. But since I can’t really do it justice, I’ll limit myself to just a few short observations.

First, and what many would find appealing from different perspectives (Mat would be one of them, I’m sure), is the idea that everything is holy, even the “unredeemed” and the “souls lost in your unnaming” (could this last word be of LC’s own creation, I wonder? Anybody knows? It brings to mind also “the cloud of unknowing” from “The Window”). I think that as we’ve seen in some earlier prayers, the influence of LC’s reading in Hassidism can be felt here, although, as already stated, it could come from other traditions as well, and anyhow, this paradoxical way of looking at thing is typical to LC’s poetry.

My second and last observation is on how once again we can feel the presence of the Jewish Prayer Book in the background of LC’s text. Specifically, and not for the first time (see #9), the allusion here, especially in the last sentence, is to the Kaddish, one of the most famous Jewish prayers, which is part of every daily prayer when recited in public, and is well known also as a prayer for the dead. The Kaddish praises God’s name, for example, “May His great name be blessed forever and to all eternity.” It is tempting to speculate on why the Kaddish stands in the background of this specific prayer of BoM (although it can also be said to stand in the background of the whole book). Perhaps, since the Kaddish is recited for the commemoration of the dead, the association was created through the “unredeemed” and the “souls lost” that come up in this prayer.
Steven
Posts: 2140
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 12:32 am

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by Steven »

Hi Doron,

I like the infusion of holiness that this prayer speaks of. In Judaism and Christianity, it isn't often that
"souls lost" are in the context of a spiritual union with the Creator. Leonard, though, consistent
with mystical and less than normative Western approaches to these faiths, appropriates "souls
lost" in contrast to a separation (the hell scenario) of more common parlance. Leonard's using
"lost," would seem to be speaking of a non-dualility or oneness -- a state of spiritual wholeness
or foundness. Kaddish, we can speculate, can be background because at time of mourning,
it can be more difficult to see a holiness of God's established life/death cycle. And this
prayer of Leonard's would be consistent with what's presumably behind Kaddish's intent --
a prompting to keep the eyes on the prize, a focus on God.
User avatar
mat james
Posts: 1847
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 8:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by mat james »

Thanks Doron for the Kaddish info and as you no doubt suspect, I will now fly off on a whim and a buckle.
II.43
Holy is your name, holy is your work, holy are the days that return to you. Holy are the years that you uncover. Holy are the hands that are raised to you, and the weeping that is wept to you. Holy is the fire between your will and ours, in which we are refined. Holy is that which is unredeemed, covered with your patience. Holy are the souls lost in you unnaming. Holy, and shining with a great light, is every living thing, established in this world and covered with time, until your name is praised forever.
These lines above take me to a number of mystic encounters by poets. Particularly this line;
“Holy is the fire between your will and ours, in which we are refined.”
...a few poems/poets come to mind, but for me Hopknis’ “Windhover” and Cruz’s "Dark Night of the Soul" dominate my reflections, right this moment.
Hopkins wrote of that “here buckle” moment when a bird buckled him to God (and the word "buckle"; so many meanings!) and the "fire" Leonard talks of above.

...“AND the fire that breaks from thee then, a billion
Times told lovelier, more dangerous, O my chevalier!
No wonder of it: shéer plód makes plough down sillion
Shine, and blue-bleak embers, ah my dear,
Fall, gall themselves, and gash gold-vermillion.

(http://www.bartleby.com/122/12.html)

Many times San Juan de la Cruz utilizes the metaphor of the Soul being purged and purified in burning coals/fire in his commentary on his poem “Dark night of the Soul”. One example below;
“On a dark night, Kindled in love with yearnings--oh, happy chance!--
...Without light or guide, save that which burned in my heart.
This light guided me More surely than the light of noonday
To the place where he (well I knew who!) was awaiting me
...I remained, lost in oblivion; My face I reclined on the Beloved.
All ceased and I abandoned myself, Leaving my cares forgotten among the lilies.”
(http://www.ecatholic2000.com/stjohn/drknt3.shtml)
Cruz goes on to say;
“This was a great happiness and a good chance for me; for, when the faculties had been perfectly annihilated and calmed, together with the passions, desires and affections of my soul, wherewith I had experienced and tasted God after a lowly manner, I went forth from my own human dealings and operations to the operations and dealings of God. That is to say, my understanding went forth from itself, turning from the human and natural to the Divine; for, when it is united with God by means of this purgation, its understanding no longer comes through its natural light and vigour, but through the Divine Wisdom wherewith it has become united. And my will went forth from itself, becoming Divine; for, being united with Divine love, it no longer loves with its natural strength after a lowly manner, but with strength and purity from the Holy Spirit; and thus the will, which is now near to God, acts not after a human manner, and similarly the memory has become transformed into eternal apprehensions of glory. And finally, by means of this night and purgation of the old man, all the energies and affections of the soul are wholly renewed into a Divine temper and Divine delight.
(http://www.ecatholic2000.com/stjohn/drknt12.shtml)
How, although this night brings darkness to the spirit, it does so in order to illumine it and give it light.
(http://www.ecatholic2000.com/stjohn/drknt15.shtml)
and Cruz goes on to elaborate the fire-y purgation; (gashing 'gold-vermillion' as Hopkins famously puts it)
FOR the greater clearness of what has been said, and of what has still to be said, it is well to observe at this point that this purgative and loving knowledge or Divine light whereof we here speak acts upon the soul which it is purging and preparing for perfect union with it in the same way as fire acts upon a log of wood in order to transform it into itself; for material fire, acting upon wood, first of all begins to dry it, by driving out its moisture and causing it to shed the water which it contains within itself. Then it begins to make it black, dark and unsightly, and even to give forth a bad odour, and, as it dries it little by little, it brings out and drives away all the dark and unsightly accidents which are contrary to the nature of fire. And, finally, it begins to kindle it externally and give it heat, and at last transforms it into itself and makes it as beautiful as fire. In this respect, the wood has neither passivity nor activity of its own,
holy is the fire
"...Holy are the souls lost in you unnaming. "
Good point you make above Steven. And as souls lose themselves "between the Nameless and the Name" (unnaming) they may be fortunate enough to venture through that dark night and into "Holy" itself by that process Leonard refers to as "unnaming"/un-naming; "in formless circumstance".

or as Leonard says in #43 above,
“Holy is the fire between your will and ours, in which we are refined."
'wholly renewed into a Divine temper and Divine delight.' (Cruz)

matbbgJ
"Without light or guide, save that which burned in my heart." San Juan de la Cruz.
User avatar
mat james
Posts: 1847
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 8:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: Book of Mercy #41-

Post by mat james »

"Without light or guide, save that which burned in my heart." San Juan de la Cruz.
Post Reply

Return to “Leonard Cohen's poetry and novels”